Question Convention.

Posts Tagged: 3D

Text

The ‘mane’ cast just ‘lion’ around.

The Lion King has often been hailed by critics as one of the greatest motion-pictures of all-time, no small feat for a film back when the medium was still deemed by the average moviegoer as ‘just for kids’. Later animated flicks like Toy Story, Shrek, and Spirited Away began to change that perception, but this 1994 Disney feature continued Beauty & The Beast’s Oscar legacy by being the highest grossing 2D animated film of all-time in the United States and spawning two sequels and a Broadway adaptation.

The Lion King was one of my first unforgettable film experiences from my childhood. I remember watching it on VHS; the Elephant Graveyard sequence and the heartbreaking death of Mufasa brought me to tears as a six-year old. I remember my aunty, who watched the film with my siblings and I while babysitting us, desperately trying to cheer us up during the later ‘Hakuna Matata’ number. My dad later watched it on his own and became so enthusiastic about the Swahili expression, that he even wrote the phrase down and made my brother and I memorise the entire song.

This film holds a cherished place in my heart, and I haven’t seen the film in its entirety until now, sixteen years later, and in a theatre with surround sound, no less. Let’s get the most pressing question out of the way first - is the 3D worth the price of admission alone? Honestly, not really. There were a few great moments like the aerial shot of the flying flamingos during the opening sequence, or that iconic image of Scar leaping towards the audience with his claws out. But other than that, the added dimension didn’t really add much to the film, unlike movies like Avatar, How to Train Your Dragon and Legend of the Guardians, which had a lot of high-altitude flight sequences and multiple-planes shots.

But does it still stand the test of time? Unsurprisingly, yes. Unlike many contemporary ‘famliy’ flms like Transformers, Alvin & The Chipmunks, and Hannah Montana: The Movie, which will become dated within the next two months, TLK’s story is timeless, probably because it owes much of its plot to the epic Shakespearean play Hamlet. If you’ve been living under a rock for the past decade, here’s the story in a nutshell: A pride of lions rule an anthropomorphic kingdom of animals in Africa, led by the incumbent king Mufasa. His son, Simba, is next to ascend the throne, but Mufasa’s jealous brother Scar has other plans. There’s political manuevring, a love story, and a sweeping tale of redemption, betrayal, and destiny, all amidst the breathtakingly majestic plains and creatures of Africa.

As an adult, it is a real treat to rediscover a childhood favourite with new eyes. The subtext of Simba and Nala’s innocent game of ‘pinning’ as kids turning into something more as adults. The talented Nathan Lane’s wisecracks, Rowan Atkinson’s pun-laden morning report, or Jeremy Irons’ deliciously sardonic quips. The Zen-like philosophising of Robert Guillaume’s Rafiki. The gravity of change and renewal during the ‘Circle of Life’ exposition by Mufasa or the wildfire/thunderstorm climax.

And of course, the animation. You can tell the animators did their homework - the animals move naturally, whether they’re swinging through the trees, flying through the air, or beating the living daylights out of each other. With the exception of the comic-relief characters, there’s a certain theatrical quality to the acting that is not often seen in most animated movies nowadays, which tend to rely on Chuck Jones-style pose-to-pose movements. Not that the latter’s a bad thing, but the characters’ performance is more restrained and measured than say, Madagascar or Rio. It’s a reflection of a different era which lacks the hyperactivity and manic delivery of modern cartoon characters.

The score by Hans Zimmer is magnificent and evocative. ‘This Land’ was a highlight for me, as it is the musical representation of Simba and Mufasa’s father-son bond, and how that transcends even death. And of course, the catchy-as-heck musical numbers like ‘I Just Can’t Wait to Be King’, ‘Hakuna Matata’, and the evergreen favourite, ‘Can You Feel the Love Tonight’.

Did I mention the cast and crew list is a veritable dream team of animation and acting legends? Chris Sanders, Brenda Chapman, John Lasseter, Ed Catmull, Tim Rice, Elton John, Mark Mancina, James Earl Jones, Matthew Broderick, Whoopi Goldberg, Cheech Marin, and last but not least, Jim Cummings. Of course, I didn’t knew who on Earth these folks were as a kid, but many movies and a tertiary education later, I can now appreciate the immense talent behind this film. It is truly inspiring to see a few of these names with the knowledge that they will later go on to do great things in their subsequent years.

If there’s any criticism I have, is that some modern-day vernacular creeps into the dialogue such as “Jeez” and “fixer-upper”, as well as a few contemporary songs courtesy of Zazu. This might not seem remarkable in a movie where African animals talk in an American accent, but it does break my suspension of disbelief and ‘snap’ me out of the timeless quality of the setting.

In summary, it’s not like I would tell you to avoid this film. This is truly a motion-picture masterpiece that will be cherished for generations to come, and one that I fully admire even now as a grown-up. It was the glorious jewel in Disney’s crown during the Renaissance period, and still stands up to its revival now, despite the redundancy of the 3D conversion. Whether you liked it as a kid, or have never seen it before, or you just happen to be a fan of movies in general, go and see it on the big screen. I would’ve gladly settled for a 2D presentation, but it is just as amazing an experience with the clunky 3D glasses.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to re-memorise those snappy verses to Timon and Pumbaa’s catchphrase.

Text

So I was at my favourite haunt (an underground newsstand in Queen Victoria’s Building near Town Hall Station) when I spotted Empire’s June issue. I had a flip-through and decided to buy it because of a few articles that caught my attention, which I’ll share below:

To celebrate the release of Cars 2, Empire ran two articles in its ‘News etc’ section. The first is ‘5 Things Cars 2’:

You can view an enlarged option of the text box on my Flickr site, but if you’ve been regularly keeping up with Cars 2-related news, you would know most of the points already. Just a couple things to take note:

- The full-name of the film John Lasseter was referring to is C’etait un rendezvous, a cult car chase classic that has no plot, only a car racing through the streets of Paris at breakneck speeds. You can easily watch it on Youtube (it’s the first video when you search the title), and I highly recommend it. I consider myself something of a car chase connoisseur (I’m even a member on Varaces, a forum devoted entirely to car chases), so the fact that the Pixarians knew of this cult short film and are using it as inspiration fills me with a little hope somewhat.

- If you’re a Pixar fan, you’d probably know the story behind the inspiration of Finn McMissile’s character, but I ‘d just like to say that it pleases me immensely that they had the idea of him being screened at a drive-in theatre (notwithstanding the connection with my username), and I would dearly love to see the deleted scene, if it could be included as an extra on the Cars 2 DVD.

- British surf music? This would certainly be an interesting take. Personally I was hoping for something more David Arnold or Brian Tyler, but hey, I’ll be open-minded about this. Fingers crossed Michael Giacchino can pull this off.

The article on the following pages is ‘Pixar 3D’, and it’s a retrospective of the company’s 11 films to date, in the words of JL himself. Again, you can view enlarged ~ versions of the text boxes on my Flickr site.

Personally, I really dislike the image used of the Pixar characters sitting in a dark theatre wearing those annoying 3D glasses. It feels like a plug for 3D technology, with a bad comp of official poster images of the characters. Although I have to give points to the compositor for keeping them to scale.

Disappointingly, they haven’t written a review for Cars 2 yet before the magazine went to print (perfectly understandable with Cars 2 late-June release date, and besides, they’ll publish it on the site and probably in the next issue). The preview blurb might annoy a couple of the Cars fanboys (and girls) though:

Oh well, at least they were consolatory about it.

They did, though, feature a review for rival Dreamwork Animation’s Kung Fu Panda 2. Read the next post for more… :)

Text


Copyright Disney Enterprises LLC

This is a very significant Pixar film for me, because it was the first one that my siblings and I saw in cinemas since Toy Story. It was also during a period for which I had an intense hatred for Pixar because of what I thought they were doing to traditionally-animated movies. I believed back then that Pixar started the whole CGI-craze that was killing the old-school animation industry, and I was quite bitter about it. I used to have motion-sickness when watching the poor CGI back then, and it was in that year (2004) that I read the announcement that ‘Home on the Range’ would be Disney’s final 2D animated film. But my parents wanted to take us because it received a great review in the local newspaper and it was doing well in the box-office, so they took it as an invitation to bring the whole family to the movies.

So I went in with anger and cynicism in my heart, and came out with an entire paradigm shift. I was moved to tears during that scene where Nigel was breathlessly telling Nemo and the tank gang of his father’s brave quest to save him, or when Dory pleaded with Marlin not to leave her because she doesn’t “want to forget”.

Of course, in two years time, a certain John Lasseter movie would change my love-hate relationship with the studio forever. But I must credit Finding Nemo for planting the seeds of doubt in the first place. And of course, here I am, in Sydney of all places, home of Nigel and the tank gang, pursuing my dreams of becoming a great storyteller like Pixar.

Happy birthday to Finding Nemo, and congratulations to Stanton and his talented team! Although the ending was perfect, I certainly wouldn’t mind a sequel, if one was ever made down the road.

Text

Here’s an [url=http://www.moviehole.net/201140029-thor-losing-out-to-fast-sequel-at-australian-box-office]analysis[/url] of why Thor failed to ‘strike’ at the Aussie box-office.

From personal experience, it’s probably because of the publicity. Apart from ‘point-of-purchase’ advertising (ie cinema lobbies) and the odd bus stop poster or two, there was little mention of Thor in the media. Oh, there were TV spots aired during primetime, but Fast Five, Rio and Hop (the latter two already in release for a fortnight) also had screentime.

Whereas for Fast Five, they took out huge full-page ads in the cinema listings for Hoyts in comparison to Thor’s quarter-pages. The distributor also sponsored the airing of the ‘Fast and Furious’ Free-To-Air premiere on Channel 7 the week before its opening, and ‘2 Fast 2 Furious’ on opening weekend. Both had a sponsor message at the beginnning and end of the airings (“This program was brought to you by Fast Five, only at the movies…”), and TV spots aired repeatedly during the breaks. Then there was ‘Tokyo Drift’ on Channel One (a free-to-air sports channel) which didn’t have the sponsosr messages to my knowledge, but had the TV spots aried as well.

Marvel didn’t release sponsor any film or TV show on Free-To-Air close to its release, which was a pity. They could’ve screened Iron Man, or Daredevil, or any of the Marvel properties they air from time to time and done that same sponsor message to raise audience awareness, but they missed that opportunity to my knowledge.

The biggest irony is that the reviewers here are giving better reviews for Thor than for Fast Five. And that an original animated bird movie is beating a superhero movie and a sequel, two of the most reliable box-office characteristics, [url=http://boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=3147&p=.htm]at the international B.O.[/url]

I had half a mind not to watch Thor because of the ridiculous way they’re forcing us to watch it in 3D by placing 2D sessions in matinee (whereas Rio had a few 2D evening sessions in its first week of release). But my brother is interested, so maybe we could use our next grocery shopping trip as an excuse to see it.