Question Convention.

Posts Tagged: animation

Text

The ‘mane’ cast just ‘lion’ around.

The Lion King has often been hailed by critics as one of the greatest motion-pictures of all-time, no small feat for a film back when the medium was still deemed by the average moviegoer as ‘just for kids’. Later animated flicks like Toy Story, Shrek, and Spirited Away began to change that perception, but this 1994 Disney feature continued Beauty & The Beast’s Oscar legacy by being the highest grossing 2D animated film of all-time in the United States and spawning two sequels and a Broadway adaptation.

The Lion King was one of my first unforgettable film experiences from my childhood. I remember watching it on VHS; the Elephant Graveyard sequence and the heartbreaking death of Mufasa brought me to tears as a six-year old. I remember my aunty, who watched the film with my siblings and I while babysitting us, desperately trying to cheer us up during the later ‘Hakuna Matata’ number. My dad later watched it on his own and became so enthusiastic about the Swahili expression, that he even wrote the phrase down and made my brother and I memorise the entire song.

This film holds a cherished place in my heart, and I haven’t seen the film in its entirety until now, sixteen years later, and in a theatre with surround sound, no less. Let’s get the most pressing question out of the way first - is the 3D worth the price of admission alone? Honestly, not really. There were a few great moments like the aerial shot of the flying flamingos during the opening sequence, or that iconic image of Scar leaping towards the audience with his claws out. But other than that, the added dimension didn’t really add much to the film, unlike movies like Avatar, How to Train Your Dragon and Legend of the Guardians, which had a lot of high-altitude flight sequences and multiple-planes shots.

But does it still stand the test of time? Unsurprisingly, yes. Unlike many contemporary ‘famliy’ flms like Transformers, Alvin & The Chipmunks, and Hannah Montana: The Movie, which will become dated within the next two months, TLK’s story is timeless, probably because it owes much of its plot to the epic Shakespearean play Hamlet. If you’ve been living under a rock for the past decade, here’s the story in a nutshell: A pride of lions rule an anthropomorphic kingdom of animals in Africa, led by the incumbent king Mufasa. His son, Simba, is next to ascend the throne, but Mufasa’s jealous brother Scar has other plans. There’s political manuevring, a love story, and a sweeping tale of redemption, betrayal, and destiny, all amidst the breathtakingly majestic plains and creatures of Africa.

As an adult, it is a real treat to rediscover a childhood favourite with new eyes. The subtext of Simba and Nala’s innocent game of ‘pinning’ as kids turning into something more as adults. The talented Nathan Lane’s wisecracks, Rowan Atkinson’s pun-laden morning report, or Jeremy Irons’ deliciously sardonic quips. The Zen-like philosophising of Robert Guillaume’s Rafiki. The gravity of change and renewal during the ‘Circle of Life’ exposition by Mufasa or the wildfire/thunderstorm climax.

And of course, the animation. You can tell the animators did their homework - the animals move naturally, whether they’re swinging through the trees, flying through the air, or beating the living daylights out of each other. With the exception of the comic-relief characters, there’s a certain theatrical quality to the acting that is not often seen in most animated movies nowadays, which tend to rely on Chuck Jones-style pose-to-pose movements. Not that the latter’s a bad thing, but the characters’ performance is more restrained and measured than say, Madagascar or Rio. It’s a reflection of a different era which lacks the hyperactivity and manic delivery of modern cartoon characters.

The score by Hans Zimmer is magnificent and evocative. ‘This Land’ was a highlight for me, as it is the musical representation of Simba and Mufasa’s father-son bond, and how that transcends even death. And of course, the catchy-as-heck musical numbers like ‘I Just Can’t Wait to Be King’, ‘Hakuna Matata’, and the evergreen favourite, ‘Can You Feel the Love Tonight’.

Did I mention the cast and crew list is a veritable dream team of animation and acting legends? Chris Sanders, Brenda Chapman, John Lasseter, Ed Catmull, Tim Rice, Elton John, Mark Mancina, James Earl Jones, Matthew Broderick, Whoopi Goldberg, Cheech Marin, and last but not least, Jim Cummings. Of course, I didn’t knew who on Earth these folks were as a kid, but many movies and a tertiary education later, I can now appreciate the immense talent behind this film. It is truly inspiring to see a few of these names with the knowledge that they will later go on to do great things in their subsequent years.

If there’s any criticism I have, is that some modern-day vernacular creeps into the dialogue such as “Jeez” and “fixer-upper”, as well as a few contemporary songs courtesy of Zazu. This might not seem remarkable in a movie where African animals talk in an American accent, but it does break my suspension of disbelief and ‘snap’ me out of the timeless quality of the setting.

In summary, it’s not like I would tell you to avoid this film. This is truly a motion-picture masterpiece that will be cherished for generations to come, and one that I fully admire even now as a grown-up. It was the glorious jewel in Disney’s crown during the Renaissance period, and still stands up to its revival now, despite the redundancy of the 3D conversion. Whether you liked it as a kid, or have never seen it before, or you just happen to be a fan of movies in general, go and see it on the big screen. I would’ve gladly settled for a 2D presentation, but it is just as amazing an experience with the clunky 3D glasses.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to re-memorise those snappy verses to Timon and Pumbaa’s catchphrase.

Text

Wow, we’ve been celebrating a lot of Pixar movies’ birthdays lately!

Well, I can’t believe it’s been five wonderful years since I fell hood-over-wheels in love with Pixar. While Finding Nemo was the primer fuel, Cars was the spark-plug ignition that kickstarted my ‘romance’ with the studio. It combined two of my greatest loves, cars and movies, into one heartfelt tribute to old-town Americana and the open road.

Happy birthday to the greatest car movie of all-time. Hopefully the sequel will enchant me as much as the first.

Text

Singaporean filmmaker Eric Khoo has just screened his first animated film ‘Tatsumi’ at the Cannes Film Festival, and is currently seeking U.S. distribution. The film is an autobiographical documentary celebrating the life of the artist Yoshihiro Tatsumi, a disciple of the legendary Osamu Tezuka and pioneer of the alternate Japanese comic art Gegika.

I really like the cel animation, it is very simple yet charming, reminscent of Waltz With Bashir and Persepolis. Coincidentally, it also shares its peers’ themes on war and conflict, although these are a side-theme to the journey of the artist, as he develops throughout his ‘illustrious’ life.

I’ve actually applied for an internship to the studio ‘Infinite Frameworks’ before (unfortunately, they weren’t accepting applicants at the time) and I’ve known about Eric Khoo (he’s a famous Singaporean indie director, but unfortunately I haven’t seen any of his films), so this is definitely a must-see for me. I’m so proud to see such stunning animation from a small-time studio and relatively unknown director, that isn’t angsty or pessimistic, but full of love, sentimentality, and a great appreciation of life’s infinite wonders.

Trailer
Gallery

Text


Copyright Disney Enterprises LLC

This is a very significant Pixar film for me, because it was the first one that my siblings and I saw in cinemas since Toy Story. It was also during a period for which I had an intense hatred for Pixar because of what I thought they were doing to traditionally-animated movies. I believed back then that Pixar started the whole CGI-craze that was killing the old-school animation industry, and I was quite bitter about it. I used to have motion-sickness when watching the poor CGI back then, and it was in that year (2004) that I read the announcement that ‘Home on the Range’ would be Disney’s final 2D animated film. But my parents wanted to take us because it received a great review in the local newspaper and it was doing well in the box-office, so they took it as an invitation to bring the whole family to the movies.

So I went in with anger and cynicism in my heart, and came out with an entire paradigm shift. I was moved to tears during that scene where Nigel was breathlessly telling Nemo and the tank gang of his father’s brave quest to save him, or when Dory pleaded with Marlin not to leave her because she doesn’t “want to forget”.

Of course, in two years time, a certain John Lasseter movie would change my love-hate relationship with the studio forever. But I must credit Finding Nemo for planting the seeds of doubt in the first place. And of course, here I am, in Sydney of all places, home of Nigel and the tank gang, pursuing my dreams of becoming a great storyteller like Pixar.

Happy birthday to Finding Nemo, and congratulations to Stanton and his talented team! Although the ending was perfect, I certainly wouldn’t mind a sequel, if one was ever made down the road.

Text


Ya think?

The following was posted in the ‘Ever Changed Your Mind about a Pixar Film’ thread last year (2010), but it bears reposting because it sums up my exact sentiments about Pixar at the moment:

I’ve mentioned this before, but before Cars, I used to despise Pixar because I saw them as the death of traditional animation. Cars was the beginning of my love affair for the studio because the film was like a dream come true for me (and its sequel Cars 2 is like a bigger piece of awesome cake because they’ve now thrown my favourite film genre into the mix).

After falling in love with Cars, I reexamined all their previous films and came to view them in a new light. Until recently, I had full confidence in their ability and talent.

What I’m going to say next may sound a little contrarian, but I’ll be honest about it. Toy Story 3 has been my first disappointment with Pixar since Cars. Don’t get me wrong, I love it, and it’s a wonderful film, much better than any live-action this year. It’s just that I felt the ending was melodramatic and the scope was less ambitious (both storywise and technically) than the preceeding films (Up, Wall-E, Ratatouille, etc.). Also, other great animated films like HTTYD, Despicable Me and LOTG made me realise the studio doesn’t have a monopoly on quality, not anymore anyway. A few more close-minded Pixar fans I’ve encountered has also made me realise how being enamoured with one studio can blind you to the progress of others.

So, yes, my opinion has been changed for a Pixar film. I was really looking forward to Toy Story 3, and while I did enjoy it on my first viewing, it started to pale on further reflection in comparison to its competitors. Maybe it’ll grow on me with subsequent viewings.

On a positive note, I have to admit I was semi-skeptical for Cars 2, but the recent trailer blew my preconceptions to smithereens, and while I’m still a little worried about the production progress and character screentimes, I have more confidence Pixar will regain my faith next year.

Text

[quote]1. The cheap looking Flash stuff with flat, boxy, stiffly animated characters that kids get for cartoons on TV now. I’ve have a hard time wanting to sit through a whole show with characters that look like this:[/quote]

I wholeheartedly agree with this. To me, most Flash cartoons are lazy animation with little movement and ugly character designs. Another annoying thing I notice is that these Flash cartoon almost always involve American teenagers in a high-school setting. Refer to Fish Hooks, My Gym Partner is a Monkey, Class of 3000, etc.

There are exceptions like My Little Ponies: Friendship is Magic, Chowder, and Phineas & Ferb, and most of these exceptions happen to be excellent shows.

[quote]2. The way that digital coloring in a cartoon can look so distracting in comparison to when all the characters and backgrounds were still hand painted in cel animation. I don’t expect this to be something that everyone would notice about a digitally colored show, but I when I put it side-by-side with a cel animated one I just see a world of difference (it’s especially noticeable if a show had been made both ways at some point) that I don’t even consider it an opinion. Best example I can really give right now is this:[/quote]

I’m okay with this, because I like how digital colouring looks brighter and has more ‘pop’ to it (again, My LIttle Ponies is a great example). So I think this is more of your personal opinion, but yeah, it does look different from traditional colouring like Duck Tales or Chip and Dale Rescue Rangers. If anything, the classic ones look more ‘real’, I guess (just like how ‘The Little Mermaid’ seems to have that ‘human touch’ compared to ‘Princess and the Frog’), but it’s not such a huge problem for me.

I agree with the other points, except the fifth one.

5. One thing I’ve brought up here before was how I felt that some US cartoons had been taking after anime way too much, but after everything that happened over in Japan I’ve kind of backed off on that since then. Japanese artists have always been very talented, but I guess to me I just felt that it could easily be a stereotypical art style over here if it’s seen or used too much.

I’m not really pertubed by the prevalence of anime because I believe that with globalisation comes a mixing and adoption of other art styles. Animes, in turn, have been inspired by Western themes and animation like Trigun, or Cowboy Bebop, so the use of anime styles in America, if only superficially or temporarily, is an interesting trend. And like the prevalence of 3D movies over 2D, we have to learn accept these changes, and that it is not the looks that matter, but the stories they tell. I will take an anime-styled cartoon with a good story (Avatar: The Last Airbender) anyday over a Western-Disney-styled cartoon with a bad story (Cool World).

One of my favourite episodes from Family Guy is the ‘[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKHgmWLHzy0]Disney episode[/url]’. It shows how much different a show will look like simply by changing its art direction, but ultimately, the offensive jokes and plots are the same as any Family Guy episode.

Again, I don’t care if anime is the next art-‘fad’ style in America, or if Japan is adopting CGI technology from America. As long as the story is good, it isn’t such a big deal for me.